PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCKIX vs. FSRTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCKIX vs. FSRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCKIX achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than FSRTX's 8.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MCKIX having a 5.67% annualized return and FSRTX not far behind at 5.44%.


MCKIX

1D
0.23%
1M
1.16%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.39%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
5.67%

FSRTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.80%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
5.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCKIX vs. FSRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCKIX
MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund
6.15%9.60%7.16%11.15%-12.54%7.88%11.03%14.85%-6.82%9.09%
FSRTX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M
8.53%10.08%5.57%4.33%-3.58%15.50%3.49%10.24%-4.26%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MCKIX and FSRTX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2005

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between MCKIX and FSRTX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCKIX vs. FSRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCKIX
MCKIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MCKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MCKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRTX
FSRTX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCKIX vs. FSRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCKIXFSRTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.68

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

7.86

-5.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

30.68

-18.34

MCKIX vs. FSRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the FSRTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCKIX and FSRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCKIXFSRTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

3.45

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.87

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.81

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.56

+0.15

Drawdowns

MCKIX vs. FSRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCKIX drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum FSRTX drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCKIX and FSRTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCKIXFSRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-33.57%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-2.06%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.95%

-5.87%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.17%

-12.89%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.18%

-19.88%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.83%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-4.42%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.53%

+0.59%

Volatility

MCKIX vs. FSRTX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) at 1.29%. This indicates that MCKIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCKIXFSRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

1.29%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.91%

3.70%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

4.69%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.79%

6.91%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.81%

6.73%

+1.08%

MCKIX vs. FSRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCKIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRTX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCKIX vs. FSRTX - Dividend Comparison

MCKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than FSRTX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRTX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M
3.89%4.44%4.56%5.05%7.07%5.14%2.02%2.81%9.10%2.32%2.06%1.41%
MCKIX
MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund
4.49%4.49%4.71%2.73%3.85%7.78%5.21%2.73%6.12%3.35%1.66%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCKIX and FSRTX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCKIX has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to FSRTX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCKIX dropped -25.69% vs FSRTX's -33.57%.

FSRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCKIX and FSRTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer