MCKIX vs. FSRRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MCKIX (MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund) and FSRRX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, MCKIX returned 5.73%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for FSRRX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCKIX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSRRX.

Performance

MCKIX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MCKIX having a 6.23% return and FSRRX slightly higher at 6.54%. Over the past 10 years, MCKIX has outperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 5.73%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.

MCKIX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 6M: 6.06%
• 1Y: 14.10%
• 3Y*: 9.74%
• 5Y*: 4.64%
• 10Y*: 5.73%

FSRRX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 6M: 6.66%
• 1Y: 12.46%
• 3Y*: 8.78%
• 5Y*: 6.10%
• 10Y*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCKIX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCKIX MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund	6.23%	9.60%	7.16%	11.15%	-12.54%	7.88%	11.03%	14.85%	-6.82%	9.09%
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund	6.54%	10.45%	5.84%	4.59%	-3.34%	15.84%	3.74%	10.48%	-3.99%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MCKIX and FSRRX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005	0.61

The correlation between MCKIX and FSRRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MCKIX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCKIX

MCKIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MCKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
MCKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MCKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MCKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
MCKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FSRRX

FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCKIX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCKIX	FSRRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.57	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.53	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.49	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	4.65	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	19.13	-6.83

MCKIX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCKIX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCKIX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCKIX drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCKIX and FSRRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCKIX	FSRRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.69%	-33.42%	+7.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.03%	-2.69%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.95%	-5.80%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.17%	-12.78%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.18%	-19.93%	+0.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-2.69%	+2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-4.21%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	0.65%	+0.49%

Volatility

MCKIX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.35%. This indicates that MCKIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCKIX	FSRRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	1.35%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.35%	3.81%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.43%	4.87%	+1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.85%	6.88%	+0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.84%	6.73%	+1.11%

MCKIX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCKIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCKIX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

MCKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than FSRRX's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund	4.21%	4.68%	4.82%	5.29%	7.31%	5.35%	2.25%	3.05%	9.39%	1.57%	2.34%	1.75%
MCKIX MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund	4.48%	4.49%	4.71%	2.73%	3.85%	7.78%	5.21%	2.73%	6.12%	3.35%	1.66%	4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCKIX and FSRRX in my portfolio?

MCKIX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCKIX or FSRRX?

MCKIX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to FSRRX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCKIX dropped -25.69% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.