PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCKIX vs. BRUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCKIX vs. BRUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCKIX achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than BRUFX's 15.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MCKIX has underperformed BRUFX with an annualized return of 5.68%, while BRUFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.73% annualized return.


MCKIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.08%
6M
5.73%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
5.68%

BRUFX

1D
1.06%
1M
6.03%
6M
15.33%
YTD
15.92%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
12.61%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCKIX vs. BRUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCKIX
MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund
5.98%9.60%7.16%11.15%-12.54%7.88%11.03%14.85%-6.82%9.09%
BRUFX
Bruce Fund
15.92%14.89%4.45%-0.74%-8.80%17.35%12.06%22.42%-3.99%12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MCKIX and BRUFX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2005

0.69

The correlation between MCKIX and BRUFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCKIX vs. BRUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCKIX
MCKIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MCKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MCKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BRUFX
BRUFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BRUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCKIX vs. BRUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCKIXBRUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.56

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

15.74

-5.76

MCKIX vs. BRUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCKIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the BRUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCKIX and BRUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCKIX vs. BRUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCKIX drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum BRUFX drawdown of -44.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCKIX and BRUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCKIXBRUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-44.50%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-7.67%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.95%

-9.66%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.17%

-17.91%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.18%

-25.44%

+6.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.35%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-9.05%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.73%

-0.59%

Volatility

MCKIX vs. BRUFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund (MCKIX) is 2.61%, while Bruce Fund (BRUFX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that MCKIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCKIXBRUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

3.56%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.41%

8.50%

-3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.43%

10.80%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.86%

10.58%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.79%

11.64%

-3.85%

MCKIX vs. BRUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCKIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BRUFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCKIX vs. BRUFX - Dividend Comparison

MCKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than BRUFX's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRUFX
Bruce Fund
5.48%6.35%5.01%6.46%13.31%9.25%5.83%2.03%2.49%4.11%6.26%4.63%
MCKIX
MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund
5.06%4.49%4.71%2.73%3.85%7.78%5.21%2.73%6.12%3.35%1.66%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCKIX and BRUFX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRUFX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to MCKIX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCKIX dropped -25.69% vs BRUFX's -44.50%.

BRUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCKIX and BRUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer