MCIFX vs. ARBIX
MCIFX (Miller Convertible Bond Fund) and ARBIX (Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares) are both mutual funds - MCIFX is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Miller, while ARBIX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Absolute Investment Advisers. Over the past 5 years, MCIFX returned 3.64%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for ARBIX. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MCIFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for ARBIX.
Performance
MCIFX vs. ARBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCIFX achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than ARBIX's 5.14% return.
MCIFX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 15.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.90%
ARBIX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 8.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 72.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MCIFX vs. ARBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCIFX Miller Convertible Bond Fund | 9.62% | 6.35% | 5.75% | 6.06% | -10.55% | 4.40% | 19.61% | 13.28% | -5.64% | 3.49% |
ARBIX Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares | 5.14% | 8.29% | 7.53% | 5.30% | -0.53% | 2.95% | 9.28% | 6.38% | 2.07% | 8,411.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCIFX and ARBIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2017 | 0.44 |
The correlation between MCIFX and ARBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCIFX vs. ARBIX — Risk / Return Rank
MCIFX
ARBIX
MCIFX vs. ARBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX) and Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares (ARBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCIFX | ARBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 3.26 | -1.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 17.16 | -14.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 91.84 | -79.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCIFX vs. ARBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, which is greater than ARBIX's maximum drawdown of -4.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCIFX and ARBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCIFX | ARBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -4.31% | -24.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.53% | -0.51% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.35% | -1.77% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.75% | -4.02% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.25% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -0.39% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.10% | +1.00% |
Volatility
MCIFX vs. ARBIX - Volatility Comparison
Miller Convertible Bond Fund (MCIFX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares (ARBIX) at 0.36%. This indicates that MCIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCIFX | ARBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 0.36% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.19% | 0.96% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.37% | 1.25% | +4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 1.83% | +4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 731.89% | -724.93% |
MCIFX vs. ARBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than ARBIX's 1.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCIFX vs. ARBIX - Dividend Comparison
MCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than ARBIX's 5.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARBIX Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares | 5.42% | 5.34% | 4.87% | 3.62% | 3.33% | 3.12% | 2.92% | 2.83% | 1.97% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCIFX Miller Convertible Bond Fund | 5.03% | 4.10% | 4.12% | 3.55% | 3.99% | 7.69% | 3.43% | 2.96% | 5.31% | 5.59% | 2.45% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCIFX and ARBIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCIFX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to ARBIX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCIFX dropped -29.19% vs ARBIX's -4.31%.
ARBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.02 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCIFX and ARBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer