PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCHS vs. YXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MCHS vs. YXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MCHS vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
13.36%31.19%6.53%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
7.67%-22.87%-29.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHS achieves a 13.36% return, which is significantly higher than YXI's 7.67% return.


MCHS

1D
2.32%
1M
-9.45%
YTD
13.36%
6M
9.20%
1Y
35.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YXI

1D
1.14%
1M
3.75%
YTD
7.67%
6M
15.61%
1Y
-2.11%
3Y*
-9.66%
5Y*
-2.70%
10Y*
-8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCHS vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MCHS vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHS
MCHS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MCHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

YXI
YXI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
YXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHS vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCHSYXIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

-0.09

+1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

0.04

+1.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.01

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

-0.06

+2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.17

-0.08

+8.25

MCHS vs. YXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the YXI Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHS and YXI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCHSYXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

-0.09

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.31

+1.14

Correlation

The correlation between MCHS and YXI is -0.66. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MCHS vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison

MCHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than YXI's 2.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
3.14%3.56%5.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
2.85%3.60%4.35%2.66%0.27%0.00%0.08%1.01%0.25%

Drawdowns

MCHS vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHS and YXI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHSYXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.75%

-81.15%

+57.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-29.83%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.45%

-78.02%

+68.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-54.05%

+46.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

22.96%

-18.62%

Volatility

MCHS vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison

Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) have volatilities of 7.12% and 7.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MCHSYXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

7.48%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

14.80%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.73%

23.78%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.87%

31.35%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.87%

27.46%

+0.41%