MCHFX vs. FHKCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MCHFX (Matthews China Fund) and FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MCHFX returned 7.43%/yr vs 15.29%/yr for FHKCX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MCHFX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for FHKCX.

Performance

MCHFX vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHFX achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 38.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHFX has underperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of 7.43%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.29% annualized return.

MCHFX

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 1.74%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 22.17%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: -6.40%
• 10Y*: 7.43%

FHKCX

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 5.25%
• YTD: 38.42%
• 6M: 41.36%
• 1Y: 81.25%
• 3Y*: 33.64%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 15.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHFX vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCHFX Matthews China Fund	1.74%	29.82%	17.84%	-19.21%	-24.38%	-19.41%	43.07%	34.57%	-21.17%	59.08%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	38.42%	42.56%	23.15%	-0.29%	-23.87%	-13.69%	47.85%	35.12%	-17.43%	51.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHFX and FHKCX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1998	0.84

The correlation between MCHFX and FHKCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MCHFX vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHFX

MCHFX Risk / Return Rank: 19
MCHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MCHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MCHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
MCHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MCHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHFX vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCHFX	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	4.00	-2.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	4.72	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.67	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	7.88	-6.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.39	24.43	-20.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCHFX vs. FHKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the FHKCX Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHFX and FHKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCHFX	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	4.00	-2.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	0.36	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.69	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.44	-0.12

Drawdowns

MCHFX vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHFX drawdown since its inception was -67.02%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHFX and FHKCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCHFX	FHKCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.02%	-61.96%	-5.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.58%	-10.80%	-4.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.77%	-22.02%	-5.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.96%	-52.42%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.75%	-58.41%	-6.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.25%	-1.06%	-36.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.11%	-20.26%	-1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.76%	3.48%	+2.28%

Volatility

MCHFX vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) have volatilities of 7.67% and 7.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCHFX	FHKCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.67%	7.52%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.20%	16.68%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.05%	21.30%	-1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.97%	24.24%	+5.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.64%	22.32%	+4.32%

MCHFX vs. FHKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHFX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKCX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCHFX vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison

MCHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than FHKCX's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.27%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%
MCHFX Matthews China Fund	1.33%	1.36%	1.91%	0.78%	7.53%	6.54%	1.25%	1.12%	22.28%	10.31%	13.66%	19.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCHFX and FHKCX in my portfolio?

MCHFX and FHKCX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCHFX or FHKCX?

MCHFX has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to FHKCX (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHFX dropped -67.02% vs FHKCX's -61.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.