MCHFX vs. ENTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) and ERShares Global Entrepreneurs™ (ENTIX).
MCHFX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Feb 18, 1998. ENTIX is managed by EntrepreneurShares. It was launched on Nov 10, 2010.
Performance
MCHFX vs. ENTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCHFX vs. ENTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHFX Matthews China Fund | -9.47% | 29.82% | 17.84% | -19.21% | -24.38% | -19.41% | 43.07% | 34.57% | -21.17% | 59.08% |
ENTIX ERShares Global Entrepreneurs™ | -18.94% | 22.05% | 33.84% | 23.82% | -31.67% | -8.38% | 38.75% | 27.65% | -11.04% | 30.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHFX achieves a -9.47% return, which is significantly higher than ENTIX's -18.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHFX has underperformed ENTIX with an annualized return of 5.77%, while ENTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.58% annualized return.
MCHFX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- YTD
- -9.47%
- 6M
- -14.25%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- 5.77%
ENTIX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -18.94%
- 6M
- -23.76%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCHFX vs. ENTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHFX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTIX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCHFX vs. ENTIX — Risk / Return Rank
MCHFX
ENTIX
MCHFX vs. ENTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) and ERShares Global Entrepreneurs™ (ENTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCHFX | ENTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 0.21 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.11 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 0.30 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCHFX | ENTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.21 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.03 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.41 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.41 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHFX and ENTIX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MCHFX vs. ENTIX - Dividend Comparison
MCHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than ENTIX's 0.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHFX Matthews China Fund | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.91% | 0.78% | 7.53% | 6.54% | 1.25% | 1.12% | 22.28% | 10.31% | 13.66% | 19.24% |
ENTIX ERShares Global Entrepreneurs™ | 0.05% | 0.04% | 0.61% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 29.89% | 10.55% | 3.00% | 2.92% | 8.18% | 0.00% | 0.37% |
Drawdowns
MCHFX vs. ENTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHFX drawdown since its inception was -67.02%, which is greater than ENTIX's maximum drawdown of -54.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHFX and ENTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHFX | ENTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.02% | -54.84% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.32% | -25.35% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.35% | -44.84% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.75% | -54.84% | -9.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.17% | -25.35% | -18.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.00% | -13.72% | -8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.02% | 8.76% | -1.74% |
Volatility
MCHFX vs. ENTIX - Volatility Comparison
Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to ERShares Global Entrepreneurs™ (ENTIX) at 6.21%. This indicates that MCHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCHFX | ENTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 6.21% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | 15.19% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.32% | 23.24% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.83% | 21.73% | +8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 20.81% | +5.72% |