PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCH vs. YXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MCH vs. YXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MCH vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
-6.13%30.20%17.32%-19.91%-3.12%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
7.67%-22.87%-25.36%12.40%2.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 7.67% return.


MCH

1D
0.57%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-6.13%
6M
-11.68%
1Y
10.36%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
10Y*

YXI

1D
1.14%
1M
3.75%
YTD
7.67%
6M
15.61%
1Y
-2.11%
3Y*
-9.66%
5Y*
-2.70%
10Y*
-8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCH vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MCH vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCH
MCH Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

YXI
YXI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
YXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCH vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCHYXIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

-0.09

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

0.04

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.01

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

-0.06

+0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.90

-0.08

+1.97

MCH vs. YXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the YXI Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCH and YXI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCHYXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

-0.09

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

-0.31

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between MCH and YXI is -0.91. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MCH vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison

MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than YXI's 2.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
1.88%1.76%1.31%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
2.85%3.60%4.35%2.66%0.27%0.00%0.08%1.01%0.25%

Drawdowns

MCH vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and YXI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHYXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-81.15%

+40.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.61%

-29.83%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.80%

-78.02%

+65.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-54.05%

+34.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

22.96%

-17.32%

Volatility

MCH vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) is 6.96%, while ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that MCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MCHYXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

7.48%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

14.80%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.81%

23.78%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.85%

31.35%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.85%

27.46%

+2.39%