MCH vs. MKOR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MCH (Matthews China Active ETF) and MKOR (Matthews Korea Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCH is a China Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while MKOR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MCH returned 28.39% vs 187.66% for MKOR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

MCH vs. MKOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than MKOR's 96.84% return.

MCH

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: 3.98%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 28.39%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MKOR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 16.82%
• YTD: 96.84%
• 6M: 107.34%
• 1Y: 187.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCH vs. MKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	3.98%	30.20%	17.32%	-10.85%
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	96.84%	70.33%	-15.76%	-2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MCH and MKOR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023	0.41

MCH vs. MKOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MCH	MKOR
Financial Services	25.5%	8.0%
Consumer Cyclical	16.2%	7.0%
Technology	15.0%	56.1%
Communication Services	13.2%	2.1%
Industrials	12.4%	15.0%
Basic Materials	9.5%	0.8%
Healthcare	5.5%	1.5%
Real Estate	2.7%	-
Energy	1.0%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	1.7%
Utilities	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

MCH vs. MKOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCH

MCH Risk / Return Rank: 38
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 33

MKOR

MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 96
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCH vs. MKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCH	MKOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	5.08	-3.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	4.94	-2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.70	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	9.16	-7.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.10	35.31	-30.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCH vs. MKOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCH Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the MKOR Sharpe Ratio of 5.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCH and MKOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCH	MKOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	5.08	-3.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	1.57	-1.38

Drawdowns

MCH vs. MKOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than MKOR's maximum drawdown of -22.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and MKOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCH	MKOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-22.09%	-18.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.05%	-20.62%	+5.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	-2.27%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.50%	-6.22%	-12.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.58%	5.34%	+0.24%

Volatility

MCH vs. MKOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) is 6.72%, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a volatility of 17.87%. This indicates that MCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCH	MKOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.72%	17.87%	-11.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.45%	33.29%	-18.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.18%	37.15%	-16.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.53%	27.06%	+2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.53%	27.06%	+2.47%

MCH vs. MKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MCH and MKOR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

MCH vs. MKOR - Dividend Comparison

MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than MKOR's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	1.69%	1.76%	1.31%	1.62%
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	1.33%	2.62%	5.28%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCH and MKOR in my portfolio?

MCH and MKOR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCH or MKOR?

MKOR has higher volatility (17.87%) compared to MCH (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCH dropped -40.53% vs MKOR's -22.09%.

Which ETF is better, MCH or MKOR?

On 1-year performance, MKOR leads with 187.66% vs 28.39% for MCH. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, MCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MCH or MKOR?

Over the 1-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 187.66% return vs 28.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MCH or MKOR?

MCH and MKOR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MCH or MKOR?

MCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.33% for MKOR.

What is the main difference between MCH and MKOR?

MCH is categorized as China Equities, while MKOR is Asia Pacific Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.