PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCH vs. INDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MCH vs. INDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MCH vs. INDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
-6.13%30.20%17.32%-8.02%
INDE
Matthews India Active ETF
-13.87%2.39%10.95%8.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly higher than INDE's -13.87% return.


MCH

1D
0.57%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-6.13%
6M
-11.68%
1Y
10.36%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
10Y*

INDE

1D
-0.05%
1M
-8.07%
YTD
-13.87%
6M
-11.36%
1Y
-3.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCH vs. INDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MCH and INDE have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

MCH vs. INDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCH
MCH Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

INDE
INDE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
INDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
INDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCH vs. INDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCHINDEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

-0.22

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

-0.20

+0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.98

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

-0.25

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.90

-0.91

+2.81

MCH vs. INDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the INDE Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCH and INDE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCHINDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

-0.22

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.14

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between MCH and INDE is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MCH vs. INDE - Dividend Comparison

MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than INDE's 2.04% yield.


TTM202520242023
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
1.88%1.76%1.31%1.62%
INDE
Matthews India Active ETF
2.04%1.75%0.56%0.00%

Drawdowns

MCH vs. INDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than INDE's maximum drawdown of -22.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and INDE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHINDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-22.89%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.61%

-19.10%

+1.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.80%

-20.24%

+7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-6.96%

-12.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

5.23%

+0.41%

Volatility

MCH vs. INDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) is 6.96%, while Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that MCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MCHINDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

7.83%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

12.19%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.81%

16.60%

+7.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.85%

16.05%

+13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.85%

16.05%

+13.80%