MCH vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MCH (Matthews China Active ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCH is a China Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. MCH is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, MCH returned 28.39% vs 4.83% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. MCH charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

MCH vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.46% return.

MCH

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: 3.98%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 28.39%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 4.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCH vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	3.98%	30.20%	17.32%	-7.91%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	2.46%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MCH and IBID is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	-0.03

Return for Risk

MCH vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCH

MCH Risk / Return Rank: 38
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 33

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 97
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCH vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCH	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	3.91	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	6.75	-4.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.94	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	13.33	-11.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.10	39.52	-34.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCH vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCH Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCH and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCH	IBID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	3.91	-2.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	2.56	-2.37

Drawdowns

MCH vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCH	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-1.28%	-39.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.05%	-0.36%	-14.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	0.00%	-3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.50%	-0.22%	-18.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.58%	0.12%	+5.46%

Volatility

MCH vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that MCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCH	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.72%	0.32%	+6.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.45%	0.80%	+13.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.18%	1.25%	+18.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.53%	2.25%	+27.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.53%	2.25%	+27.28%

MCH vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCH vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than IBID's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.66%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	1.69%	1.76%	1.31%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCH and IBID in my portfolio?

MCH and IBID have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCH or IBID?

MCH has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCH dropped -40.53% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, MCH or IBID?

On 1-year performance, MCH leads with 28.39% vs 4.83% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MCH or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, MCH has performed better with a 28.39% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MCH or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MCH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MCH or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.69% for MCH.

What is the main difference between MCH and IBID?

MCH is categorized as China Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MCH and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.