MCH vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MCH (Matthews China Active ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MCH is a China Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. MCH is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MCH returned 13.78%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for DBO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MCH charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

MCH vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 50.16% return.

MCH

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 3.54%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 23.79%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -18.58%
• YTD: 50.16%
• 6M: 47.74%
• 1Y: 36.30%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: 9.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCH vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	3.54%	30.20%	17.32%	-19.91%	-3.57%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	50.16%	-11.71%	7.85%	-4.44%	-7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MCH and DBO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.08

The correlation between MCH and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MCH vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCH

MCH Risk / Return Rank: 33
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 31

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 31
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCH vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCH	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.06	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.61	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	1.58	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.20	4.29	-0.10

MCH vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCH Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCH and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCH vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCH	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-90.18%	+49.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.05%	-23.03%	+7.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.57%	-28.20%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.82%	-60.48%	+56.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.31%	-62.22%	+43.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.68%	8.51%	-2.83%

Volatility

MCH vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) is 8.12%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that MCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCH	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	10.29%	-2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.66%	29.36%	-13.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.89%	34.89%	-14.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.51%	32.54%	-3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.51%	31.81%	-2.30%

MCH vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCH vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than DBO's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	2.34%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	1.70%	1.76%	1.31%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCH and DBO in my portfolio?

MCH and DBO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCH or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to MCH (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCH dropped -40.53% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, MCH or DBO?

On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 14.32% vs 13.78% for MCH. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, MCH has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MCH or DBO?

Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 14.32% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MCH or DBO?

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MCH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MCH or DBO?

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.70% for MCH.

What is the main difference between MCH and DBO?

MCH is categorized as China Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MCH and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.