MCGFX vs. YAFFX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX).
MCGFX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Nov 2, 1994. YAFFX is managed by AMG. It was launched on May 1, 1997.
Performance
MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund | -1.92% | -19.12% | 14.37% | 34.16% | -27.05% | 25.78% | 31.91% | 32.61% | -1.47% | 23.36% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 10.26% | 3.89% | 9.30% | 16.53% | -8.20% | 16.48% | 17.22% | 19.21% | 2.99% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCGFX achieves a -1.92% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 10.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MCGFX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 8.74%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
MCGFX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- -1.92%
- 6M
- -31.52%
- 1Y
- -16.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
YAFFX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 12.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCGFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCGFX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank
MCGFX
YAFFX
MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCGFX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 0.58 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 0.76 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.18 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 0.65 | -1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 2.29 | -3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCGFX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 0.58 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.42 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.68 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.59 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCGFX and YAFFX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MCGFX nor YAFFX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.27% | 3.66% | 10.96% | 78.35% | 16.87% | 9.08% | 25.33% | 9.88% | 11.33% | 33.82% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.44% | 4.42% | 7.60% | 4.70% | 11.87% | 15.84% | 22.15% | 11.82% | 11.81% | 24.36% |
Drawdowns
MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCGFX drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, roughly equal to the maximum YAFFX drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCGFX and YAFFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCGFX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -43.80% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.89% | -17.08% | -18.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.89% | -21.31% | -14.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.89% | -30.62% | -5.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.49% | -7.31% | -26.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -6.24% | -4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.27% | 4.85% | +11.42% |
Volatility
MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) have volatilities of 8.04% and 8.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCGFX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 8.00% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.96% | 21.56% | +18.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.66% | 22.92% | +15.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 17.86% | +7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 16.40% | +5.94% |