MCGFX vs. YAFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MCGFX (AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund) and YAFFX (AMG Yacktman Focused Fund) are both mutual funds - MCGFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while YAFFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MCGFX returned 10.29%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for YAFFX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCGFX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for YAFFX.

Performance

MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCGFX achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 30.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MCGFX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.

MCGFX

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 12.63%
• 6M: -22.52%
• 1Y: -12.07%
• 3Y*: 6.20%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

YAFFX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 8.70%
• YTD: 30.77%
• 6M: 14.70%
• 1Y: 28.89%
• 3Y*: 17.76%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: 12.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund	12.63%	-19.12%	14.37%	34.16%	-27.05%	25.78%	31.91%	32.61%	-1.47%	23.36%
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	30.77%	3.89%	9.30%	16.53%	-8.20%	16.48%	17.22%	19.21%	2.99%	20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MCGFX and YAFFX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 1997	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between MCGFX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MCGFX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCGFX

MCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

YAFFX

YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 25
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCGFX	YAFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	1.32	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	1.46	-1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.36	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	1.71	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	6.17	-6.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCGFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCGFX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCGFX	YAFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	1.32	-1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.58	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.78	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.62	-0.14

Drawdowns

MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCGFX drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, roughly equal to the maximum YAFFX drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCGFX and YAFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCGFX	YAFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.56%	-43.80%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.89%	-17.08%	-18.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.89%	-18.88%	-17.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.89%	-21.31%	-14.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.89%	-30.62%	-5.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.63%	-0.48%	-23.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-6.21%	-4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.48%	4.70%	+14.78%

Volatility

MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) have volatilities of 6.02% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCGFX	YAFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	6.13%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.40%	22.29%	+18.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.98%	22.19%	+13.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.17%	18.10%	+7.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	16.53%	+5.93%

MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCGFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCGFX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MCGFX nor YAFFX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.27%	3.66%	10.96%	78.35%	16.87%	9.08%	25.33%	9.88%	11.33%	33.82%
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	0.00%	0.00%	18.44%	4.42%	7.60%	4.70%	11.87%	15.84%	22.15%	11.82%	11.81%	24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCGFX and YAFFX in my portfolio?

MCGFX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCGFX or YAFFX?

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to MCGFX (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCGFX dropped -45.56% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YAFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.