PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCGFX vs. TILIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCGFX vs. TILIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCGFX achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than TILIX's 8.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MCGFX has underperformed TILIX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while TILIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.64% annualized return.


MCGFX

1D
1.36%
1M
2.76%
YTD
12.63%
6M
-22.52%
1Y
-12.07%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
10.29%

TILIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.58%
6M
7.86%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
18.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCGFX vs. TILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCGFX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund
12.63%-19.12%14.37%34.16%-27.05%25.78%31.91%32.61%-1.47%23.36%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
8.58%18.41%33.31%42.64%-29.22%27.63%38.43%36.30%-1.66%28.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MCGFX and TILIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.94

The correlation between MCGFX and TILIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCGFX vs. TILIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCGFX
MCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TILIX
TILIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCGFX vs. TILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCGFXTILIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.32

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

1.75

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

5.84

-6.45

MCGFX vs. TILIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCGFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the TILIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCGFX and TILIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCGFXTILIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

1.84

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.75

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.89

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.61

-0.13

Drawdowns

MCGFX vs. TILIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCGFX drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum TILIX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCGFX and TILIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCGFXTILIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-50.54%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.89%

-16.24%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.89%

-23.33%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.89%

-32.68%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.89%

-32.68%

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.63%

-0.37%

-23.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-7.73%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.48%

4.84%

+14.64%

Volatility

MCGFX vs. TILIX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) at 3.32%. This indicates that MCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCGFXTILIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

3.32%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.40%

11.60%

+28.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.98%

15.42%

+20.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.17%

21.47%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

21.09%

+1.37%

MCGFX vs. TILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCGFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than TILIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCGFX vs. TILIX - Dividend Comparison

MCGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCGFX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%10.27%3.66%10.96%78.35%16.87%9.08%25.33%9.88%11.33%33.82%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
4.06%4.41%3.25%1.90%11.00%8.76%1.91%2.38%4.01%0.68%1.33%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCGFX and TILIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCGFX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to TILIX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCGFX dropped -45.56% vs TILIX's -50.54%.

TILIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCGFX and TILIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer