PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCFIX vs. GUGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCFIX vs. GUGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCFIX achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than GUGAX's 0.96% return.


MCFIX

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.23%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
-0.85%
1Y
1.85%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*

GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.96%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
1.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCFIX vs. GUGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
-1.32%6.64%2.02%6.47%-13.69%-1.05%4.75%3.31%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MCFIX and GUGAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between MCFIX and GUGAX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCFIX vs. GUGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCFIX
MCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCFIX vs. GUGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCFIXGUGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.45

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

4.82

-4.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

14.23

-12.54

MCFIX vs. GUGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the GUGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCFIX and GUGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCFIX vs. GUGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCFIX drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, smaller than the maximum GUGAX drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCFIX and GUGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCFIXGUGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.68%

-38.57%

+16.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.75%

-1.16%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.32%

-6.12%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

-20.53%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-6.72%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-11.26%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

0.39%

+0.99%

Volatility

MCFIX vs. GUGAX - Volatility Comparison

Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MCFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCFIXGUGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.00%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

1.30%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

2.80%

+1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

6.57%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.10%

5.42%

+0.68%

MCFIX vs. GUGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCFIX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than GUGAX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCFIX vs. GUGAX - Dividend Comparison

MCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than GUGAX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
4.52%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
4.32%3.89%4.54%3.68%3.31%2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCFIX and GUGAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCFIX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCFIX dropped -21.68% vs GUGAX's -38.57%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCFIX and GUGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer