MCDS vs. GRNJ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCDS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.

Performance

MCDS vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCDS achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly higher than GRNJ's 14.29% return.

MCDS

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.50%
• 6M: 11.46%
• YTD: 15.40%
• 1Y: 19.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRNJ

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -6.68%
• 6M: 4.21%
• YTD: 14.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCDS vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF	15.40%	4.47%
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	14.29%	6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MCDS and GRNJ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

MCDS vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCDS

MCDS Risk / Return Rank: 60
MCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
MCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
MCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
MCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 68

GRNJ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCDS vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCDS	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.80	—	—

Drawdowns

MCDS vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCDS drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDS and GRNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCDS	GRNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-17.32%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-10.43%	+9.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-4.31%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MCDS	GRNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.50%	30.54%	-17.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	30.54%	-13.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.77%	30.54%	-13.77%

MCDS vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCDS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCDS vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

MCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF	1.04%	1.23%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCDS and GRNJ in my portfolio?

MCDS and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MCDS or GRNJ?

On fees, MCDS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MCDS or GRNJ?

MCDS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MCDS or GRNJ?

MCDS has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

What is the main difference between MCDS and GRNJ?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MCDS and 0.75% for GRNJ.