MCDS vs. DRES

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF) and DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MCDS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRES.

Performance

MCDS vs. DRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCDS achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly lower than DRES's 21.60% return.

MCDS

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 13.29%
• YTD: 15.90%
• 1Y: 21.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.65%

DRES

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 12.48%
• YTD: 21.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	$93.72K	$76.15K	$99.36K
MCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF	$117.48K	$57.47K	$28.02K

MCDS vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF	15.90%	1.40%
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	21.60%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MCDS and DRES is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

MCDS vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCDS

MCDS Risk / Return Rank: 71
MCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
MCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

DRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCDS vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCDS	DRES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.41	—	—

Drawdowns

MCDS vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCDS drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDS and DRES.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCDS	DRES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-10.41%	-12.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-1.59%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-2.14%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MCDS	DRES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.31%	18.07%	-4.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.58%	18.07%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.58%	18.07%	-1.49%

MCDS vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCDS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCDS vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison

MCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than DRES's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.52%	0.22%	0.00%
MCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF	1.04%	1.23%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCDS and DRES in my portfolio?

MCDS and DRES have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MCDS or DRES?

On fees, MCDS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MCDS or DRES?

MCDS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MCDS or DRES?

MCDS has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.52% for DRES.

What is the main difference between MCDS and DRES?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MCDS and 0.50% for DRES.