MCD vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, MCD returned 0.46%/yr vs 51.00%/yr for CHAT. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

MCD vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -9.28% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 62.42% return.

MCD

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -2.31%
• YTD: -9.28%
• 6M: -11.51%
• 1Y: -3.75%
• 3Y*: 0.46%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

CHAT

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 62.42%
• 6M: 61.25%
• 1Y: 107.18%
• 3Y*: 51.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCD vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MCD McDonald's Corporation	-9.28%	7.89%	0.14%	2.73%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	62.42%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MCD and CHAT is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MCD and CHAT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

MCD vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCD

MCD Risk / Return Rank: 32
MCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MCD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MCD Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCD vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCD	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	3.10	-3.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	3.36	-3.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.47	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	6.62	-6.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	18.29	-18.76

MCD vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCD Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCD and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCD vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCD	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.20%	-31.34%	-41.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.82%	-16.28%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.82%	-31.34%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.70%	-7.99%	-10.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.90%	-5.39%	-9.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.00%	5.88%	+2.12%

Volatility

MCD vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 5.87%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 19.26%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCD	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.87%	19.26%	-13.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.42%	29.49%	-17.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.89%	34.88%	-17.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	31.21%	-13.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	31.21%	-10.77%

Dividends

MCD vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than CHAT's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.76%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MCD McDonald's Corporation	2.68%	2.35%	2.34%	2.10%	2.15%	1.96%	2.35%	2.39%	2.36%	2.23%	2.97%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCD and CHAT in my portfolio?

MCD and CHAT have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCD or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to MCD (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCD dropped -73.20% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.