MCD vs. CHAT
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, MCD returned 0.49%/yr vs 54.00%/yr for CHAT. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MCD vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -9.66% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 70.00% return.
MCD
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- -9.66%
- 6M
- -10.51%
- 1Y
- -10.35%
- 3Y*
- 0.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
CHAT
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 21.73%
- YTD
- 70.00%
- 6M
- 67.89%
- 1Y
- 133.72%
- 3Y*
- 54.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCD vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -9.66% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 2.53% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 70.00% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCD and CHAT is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between MCD and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCD vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
MCD
CHAT
MCD vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.61 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 8.26 | -8.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 24.36 | -25.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 4.37 | -5.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.93 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
MCD vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -31.34% | -41.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -16.28% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -31.34% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.05% | -3.11% | -15.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -5.35% | -9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.30% | 5.51% | +1.79% |
Volatility
MCD vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 4.76%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 12.18%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCD | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 12.18% | -7.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 24.80% | -12.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 30.81% | -14.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 29.92% | -12.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 29.92% | -9.54% |
Dividends
MCD vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than CHAT's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.68% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.70% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCD and CHAT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to MCD (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCD dropped -73.20% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.37 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCD and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer