MCBDX vs. QDVBX
Compare and contrast key facts about MassMutual Core Bond Fund (MCBDX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX).
MCBDX is managed by MassMutual. It was launched on Sep 30, 1994. QDVBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.
Performance
MCBDX vs. QDVBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCBDX vs. QDVBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCBDX MassMutual Core Bond Fund | -0.81% | 8.03% | 1.13% | 6.64% | -15.29% | 38.26% | 8.42% | -0.09% |
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | -0.11% | 7.64% | 1.62% | 6.37% | -14.31% | -0.37% | 6.70% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCBDX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than QDVBX's -0.11% return.
MCBDX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.36%
QDVBX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCBDX vs. QDVBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCBDX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVBX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCBDX vs. QDVBX — Risk / Return Rank
MCBDX
QDVBX
MCBDX vs. QDVBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Core Bond Fund (MCBDX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCBDX | QDVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.04 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.52 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.99 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | 5.75 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCBDX | QDVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.04 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.05 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.14 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCBDX and QDVBX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCBDX vs. QDVBX - Dividend Comparison
MCBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than QDVBX's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCBDX MassMutual Core Bond Fund | 4.14% | 4.50% | 1.93% | 4.62% | 3.83% | 31.12% | 5.98% | 3.35% | 3.32% | 2.96% | 3.29% | 1.43% |
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.51% | 3.51% | 3.52% | 3.66% | 2.56% | 1.70% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MCBDX vs. QDVBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCBDX drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, which is greater than QDVBX's maximum drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCBDX and QDVBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCBDX | QDVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.01% | -19.86% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -2.60% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.01% | -19.86% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -2.20% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -6.80% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.90% | +0.08% |
Volatility
MCBDX vs. QDVBX - Volatility Comparison
MassMutual Core Bond Fund (MCBDX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) have volatilities of 1.50% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCBDX | QDVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 1.48% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 2.54% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 4.41% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 6.59% | +13.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 6.29% | +8.15% |