MCBDX vs. MGFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MassMutual Core Bond Fund (MCBDX) and MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX).
MCBDX is managed by MassMutual. It was launched on Sep 30, 1994. MGFAX is managed by MassMutual. It was launched on Dec 30, 2004.
Performance
MCBDX vs. MGFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCBDX vs. MGFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCBDX MassMutual Core Bond Fund | -0.81% | 8.03% | 1.13% | 6.64% | -15.29% | 38.26% | 8.42% | 9.62% | -0.48% | 4.60% |
MGFAX MassMutual Global Fund | -13.50% | 14.37% | 15.01% | 33.87% | -32.08% | 19.60% | 27.18% | 30.67% | -14.19% | 35.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCBDX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly higher than MGFAX's -13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, MCBDX has underperformed MGFAX with an annualized return of 5.36%, while MGFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.
MCBDX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.36%
MGFAX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -10.60%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCBDX vs. MGFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCBDX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than MGFAX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCBDX vs. MGFAX — Risk / Return Rank
MCBDX
MGFAX
MCBDX vs. MGFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Core Bond Fund (MCBDX) and MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCBDX | MGFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.23 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 0.47 | +1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.13 | +1.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | 0.49 | +5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCBDX | MGFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.23 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.13 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.36 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.28 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCBDX and MGFAX is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MCBDX vs. MGFAX - Dividend Comparison
MCBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than MGFAX's 50.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCBDX MassMutual Core Bond Fund | 4.14% | 4.50% | 1.93% | 4.62% | 3.83% | 31.12% | 5.98% | 3.35% | 3.32% | 2.96% | 3.29% | 1.43% |
MGFAX MassMutual Global Fund | 50.47% | 43.66% | 16.85% | 30.43% | 28.11% | 15.89% | 5.05% | 0.36% | 27.78% | 12.10% | 3.75% | 8.25% |
Drawdowns
MCBDX vs. MGFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCBDX drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, smaller than the maximum MGFAX drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCBDX and MGFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCBDX | MGFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.01% | -62.06% | +40.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -16.38% | +13.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.01% | -46.09% | +24.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.01% | -46.09% | +24.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -16.38% | +10.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -13.68% | +10.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 4.27% | -3.29% |
Volatility
MCBDX vs. MGFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MassMutual Core Bond Fund (MCBDX) is 1.50%, while MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that MCBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCBDX | MGFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 5.70% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 11.79% | -9.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 19.57% | -15.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 33.39% | -13.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 27.51% | -13.07% |