PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MC.PA is traded in EUR, while NOVO-B.CO is traded in DKK. To make them comparable, the NOVO-B.CO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -19.55% return, which is significantly lower than NOVO-B.CO's -8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has underperformed NOVO-B.CO with an annualized return of 16.10%, while NOVO-B.CO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.26% annualized return.


MC.PA

1D
3.53%
1M
10.80%
YTD
-19.55%
6M
-16.91%
1Y
13.44%
3Y*
-13.46%
5Y*
-3.38%
10Y*
16.10%

NOVO-B.CO

1D
1.61%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
-8.77%
6M
-7.60%
1Y
-41.92%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
17.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-19.55%3.93%-11.73%9.60%-4.76%43.83%24.66%63.17%7.31%37.90%
NOVO-B.CO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-8.77%-46.44%-9.91%205.51%31.09%79.61%15.78%35.77%-6.27%39.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MC.PA and NOVO-B.CO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2007

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NOVO-B.CO
NOVO-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NOVO-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVO-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVO-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVO-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVO-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MC.PANOVO-B.CODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.87

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

-0.78

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

-1.15

+1.89

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the NOVO-B.CO Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and NOVO-B.CO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, smaller than the maximum NOVO-B.CO drawdown of -76.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and NOVO-B.CO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MC.PANOVO-B.CODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.74%

-76.81%

+22.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.65%

-54.72%

+24.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.87%

-76.81%

+27.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-76.81%

+27.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

-76.81%

+27.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.02%

-70.26%

+31.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-11.90%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.58%

37.20%

-21.62%

Volatility

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) is 7.96%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that MC.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOVO-B.CO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MC.PANOVO-B.CODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

11.47%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

39.57%

-18.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.28%

54.44%

-23.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.90%

58.61%

-28.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.93%

45.19%

-17.26%

Dividends

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than NOVO-B.CO's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.55%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%
NOVO-B.CO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.07%3.58%1.59%1.01%2.38%2.54%4.03%4.22%5.27%4.54%7.38%2.50%

Financials

MC.PA vs. NOVO-B.CO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MC.PA values in EUR, NOVO-B.CO values in DKK

Frequently Asked Questions


MC.PA and NOVO-B.CO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MC.PA and NOVO-B.CO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer