PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MC.PA vs. CSPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MC.PA vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MC.PA is traded in EUR, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -19.55% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has outperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 16.10%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.87% annualized return.


MC.PA

1D
3.53%
1M
10.80%
YTD
-19.55%
6M
-16.91%
1Y
13.44%
3Y*
-13.46%
5Y*
-3.38%
10Y*
16.10%

CSPX.L

1D
2.10%
1M
0.05%
YTD
10.06%
6M
11.30%
1Y
24.68%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
14.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MC.PA vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-19.55%3.93%-11.73%9.60%-4.76%43.83%24.66%63.17%7.31%37.90%
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.06%3.52%33.52%22.94%-13.69%39.03%7.93%33.50%-1.02%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MC.PA and CSPX.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.44

The correlation between MC.PA and CSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MC.PA vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPX.L
CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC.PA vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MC.PACSPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.36

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.47

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

11.77

-11.03

MC.PA vs. CSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and CSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and CSPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MC.PACSPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.74%

-33.40%

-21.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.65%

-7.09%

-23.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.87%

-22.56%

-26.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-22.56%

-26.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

-33.40%

-15.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.02%

-1.74%

-37.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-4.11%

-7.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.58%

2.09%

+13.49%

Volatility

MC.PA vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.02%. This indicates that MC.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MC.PACSPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

4.02%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

9.09%

+12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.28%

12.75%

+18.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.90%

16.00%

+13.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.93%

16.64%

+11.29%

Dividends

MC.PA vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, while CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.55%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


MC.PA and CSPX.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MC.PA and CSPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer