MC.PA vs. CPRT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MC.PA (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) and CPRT (Copart, Inc.) are both stocks. MC.PA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while CPRT operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, MC.PA returned 16.10%/yr vs 17.20%/yr for CPRT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MC.PA vs. CPRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Copart, Inc. (CPRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MC.PA is traded in EUR, while CPRT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CPRT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MC.PA having a -19.55% return and CPRT slightly lower at -20.25%. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has underperformed CPRT with an annualized return of 16.10%, while CPRT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.20% annualized return.

MC.PA

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: 10.80%
• YTD: -19.55%
• 6M: -16.91%
• 1Y: 13.44%
• 3Y*: -13.46%
• 5Y*: -3.38%
• 10Y*: 16.10%

CPRT

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -5.47%
• YTD: -20.25%
• 6M: -19.30%
• 1Y: -38.38%
• 3Y*: -12.88%
• 5Y*: 0.62%
• 10Y*: 17.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MC.PA vs. CPRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne	-19.55%	3.93%	-11.73%	9.60%	-4.76%	43.83%	24.66%	63.17%	7.31%	37.90%
CPRT Copart, Inc.	-20.25%	-39.88%	24.85%	56.12%	-14.70%	28.06%	28.39%	94.63%	15.82%	36.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MC.PA and CPRT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007	0.25

The correlation between MC.PA and CPRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MC.PA vs. CPRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MC.PA

MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 52
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 51

CPRT

CPRT Risk / Return Rank: 2
CPRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CPRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CPRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CPRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CPRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC.PA vs. CPRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Copart, Inc. (CPRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MC.PA	CPRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	-1.60	+1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	-2.34	+3.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.72	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	-0.99	+1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.74	-1.74	+2.48

MC.PA vs. CPRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the CPRT Sharpe Ratio of -1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and CPRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. CPRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, roughly equal to the maximum CPRT drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and CPRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MC.PA	CPRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.74%	-56.98%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.65%	-39.00%	+8.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.87%	-56.98%	+8.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.03%	-56.98%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.03%	-56.98%	+7.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.02%	-56.30%	+17.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.08%	-12.08%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.58%	22.51%	-6.93%

Volatility

MC.PA vs. CPRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) is 7.96%, while Copart, Inc. (CPRT) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that MC.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MC.PA	CPRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.96%	8.62%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.54%	19.23%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.28%	24.11%	+7.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.90%	25.60%	+4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.93%	27.54%	+0.39%

Dividends

MC.PA vs. CPRT - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, while CPRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPRT Copart, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne	2.55%	2.02%	2.05%	1.70%	1.76%	0.96%	0.90%	1.50%	2.09%	1.71%	1.98%	2.28%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MC.PA and CPRT in my portfolio?

MC.PA and CPRT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.