MC.PA vs. BOL.PA
MC.PA (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) and BOL.PA (Bollore SA) are both stocks. MC.PA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while BOL.PA operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, MC.PA returned 16.10%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for BOL.PA. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MC.PA vs. BOL.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -19.55% return, which is significantly lower than BOL.PA's 13.57% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has outperformed BOL.PA with an annualized return of 16.10%, while BOL.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.
MC.PA
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 12.89%
- YTD
- -19.55%
- 6M
- -16.91%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- -13.46%
- 5Y*
- -3.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
BOL.PA
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 0.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
MC.PA vs. BOL.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -19.55% | 3.93% | -11.73% | 9.60% | -4.76% | 43.83% | 24.66% | 63.17% | 7.31% | 37.90% |
BOL.PA Bollore SA | 13.57% | -18.10% | 6.23% | 9.60% | 7.45% | 47.47% | -11.31% | 12.85% | -21.60% | 37.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between MC.PA and BOL.PA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2006 | 0.39 |
The correlation between MC.PA and BOL.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MC.PA vs. BOL.PA — Risk / Return Rank
MC.PA
BOL.PA
MC.PA vs. BOL.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Bollore SA (BOL.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MC.PA | BOL.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.05 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.18 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 0.35 | +0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MC.PA vs. BOL.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, roughly equal to the maximum BOL.PA drawdown of -55.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and BOL.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MC.PA | BOL.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -55.65% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.65% | -18.43% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.87% | -29.25% | -19.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.03% | -29.25% | -19.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.03% | -53.11% | +4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.02% | -11.93% | -27.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -14.75% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.58% | 9.38% | +6.20% |
Volatility
MC.PA vs. BOL.PA - Volatility Comparison
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Bollore SA (BOL.PA) at 4.19%. This indicates that MC.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOL.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MC.PA | BOL.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 4.19% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | 16.66% | +4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.28% | 19.79% | +11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 21.36% | +8.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 24.45% | +3.48% |
Dividends
MC.PA vs. BOL.PA - Dividend Comparison
MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than BOL.PA's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOL.PA Bollore SA | 0.37% | 1.67% | 1.18% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.22% | 1.78% | 1.54% | 1.71% | 1.32% | 1.79% | 1.40% |
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.55% | 2.02% | 2.05% | 1.70% | 1.76% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.50% | 2.09% | 1.71% | 1.98% | 2.28% |
Financials
MC.PA vs. BOL.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Bollore SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MC.PA and BOL.PA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MC.PA and BOL.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer