MBXIX vs. FSLTX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MBXIX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I) and FSLTX (Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 3 years, MBXIX returned 10.06%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for FSLTX. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MBXIX charges 2.04%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for FSLTX.

Performance

MBXIX vs. FSLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBXIX achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than FSLTX's 5.48% return.

MBXIX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: 9.25%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 1Y: 18.31%
• 3Y*: 10.06%
• 5Y*: 7.54%
• 10Y*: 7.85%
• ALL TIME*: 9.02%

FSLTX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 3.80%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 1Y: 10.06%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSLTX Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MBXIX vs. FSLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	13.75%	4.35%	13.49%	-0.76%
FSLTX Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund	5.48%	7.69%	10.10%	1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MBXIX and FSLTX is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023	0.26

The correlation between MBXIX and FSLTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MBXIX vs. FSLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBXIX

MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FSLTX

FSLTX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FSLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
FSLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FSLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FSLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FSLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBXIX vs. FSLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBXIX	FSLTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	5.17	-2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	8.00	-4.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	2.49	-1.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	13.51	-9.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.67	56.12	-39.46

MBXIX vs. FSLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the FSLTX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXIX and FSLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MBXIX vs. FSLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.73%, which is greater than FSLTX's maximum drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXIX and FSLTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBXIX	FSLTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.73%	-3.78%	-27.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.85%	-0.86%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.59%	-3.78%	-11.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-0.38%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.95%	-0.59%	-3.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	0.26%	+0.75%

Volatility

MBXIX vs. FSLTX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX) at 1.07%. This indicates that MBXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBXIX	FSLTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.78%	1.07%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.94%	1.77%	+3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.93%	2.26%	+4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.40%	4.80%	+6.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.36%	4.80%	+8.56%

MBXIX vs. FSLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXIX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLTX's 1.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBXIX vs. FSLTX - Dividend Comparison

MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FSLTX Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund	5.22%	5.50%	7.52%	3.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	2.63%	2.25%	7.74%	0.00%	4.27%	5.18%	3.33%	3.33%	1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBXIX and FSLTX in my portfolio?

MBXIX and FSLTX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBXIX or FSLTX?

MBXIX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to FSLTX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXIX dropped -31.73% vs FSLTX's -3.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.