PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBSX vs. JMTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBSX vs. JMTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) and JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSX achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than JMTG's 0.27% return.


MBSX

1D
0.84%
1M
0.82%
6M
-4.10%
YTD
5.39%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.23%

JMTG

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.74%
6M
0.18%
YTD
0.27%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$32.18M$28.84M$37.74M
$146.22K$105.02K$106.65K

MBSX vs. JMTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MBSX
Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF
5.39%5.73%
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.27%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MBSX and JMTG is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBSX vs. JMTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBSX
MBSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

JMTG
JMTG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JMTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMTG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JMTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBSX vs. JMTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) and JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBSXJMTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.18

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

1.36

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

3.40

-2.57

MBSX vs. JMTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the JMTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSX and JMTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBSX vs. JMTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSX drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, which is greater than JMTG's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSX and JMTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBSXJMTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.57%

-2.78%

-24.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.57%

-2.78%

-24.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.18%

-1.97%

-19.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-0.81%

-7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.08%

1.11%

+9.97%

Volatility

MBSX vs. JMTG - Volatility Comparison

Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) at 1.01%. This indicates that MBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBSXJMTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.90%

1.01%

+9.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.85%

2.91%

+49.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.38%

3.58%

+51.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.23%

3.68%

+49.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.23%

3.68%

+49.55%

MBSX vs. JMTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JMTG's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBSX vs. JMTG - Dividend Comparison

MBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than JMTG's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.35%2.10%
MBSX
Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF
3.56%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBSX and JMTG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBSX has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to JMTG (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBSX dropped -27.57% vs JMTG's -2.78%.

On 1-year performance, MBSX leads with 9.16% vs 3.75% for JMTG. On fees, JMTG is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JMTG has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MBSX has performed better with a 9.16% return vs 3.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMTG is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBSX.

JMTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 3.56% for MBSX.

They also come from different issuers: Regan and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MBSX and 0.24% for JMTG.

JMTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBSX and JMTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer