PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBSX vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBSX vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSX achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 14.22% return.


MBSX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.91%
YTD
5.41%
6M
5.11%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMDY

1D
-1.43%
1M
-9.33%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.70%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBSX vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MBSX and CMDY is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBSX vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSX
MBSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBSX vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBSXCMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

1.75

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.15

7.16

-6.01

MBSX vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSX and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBSX vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSX drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSX and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBSXCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.57%

-31.19%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.57%

-12.56%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.16%

-12.56%

-8.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-13.11%

+6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.50%

3.09%

+5.41%

Volatility

MBSX vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) has a higher volatility of 41.28% compared to iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) at 3.63%. This indicates that MBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBSXCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.28%

3.63%

+37.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.02%

14.45%

+37.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.80%

16.35%

+38.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.59%

15.77%

+38.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.59%

14.63%

+39.96%

MBSX vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBSX vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

MBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than CMDY's 11.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
11.29%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%
MBSX
Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF
3.38%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBSX and CMDY have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBSX has higher volatility (41.28%) compared to CMDY (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBSX dropped -27.57% vs CMDY's -31.19%.

On 1-year performance, CMDY leads with 21.95% vs 9.78% for MBSX. On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, CMDY has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CMDY has performed better with a 21.95% return vs 9.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBSX.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 3.38% for MBSX.

MBSX is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while CMDY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Regan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MBSX and 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBSX and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer