MBSF vs. BOBP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MBSF (Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF) and BOBP (CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBSF is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Regan, while BOBP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index. MBSF is actively managed, while BOBP is passively managed. Over the past year, MBSF returned 5.62% vs 32.67% for BOBP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MBSF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BOBP.

Performance

MBSF vs. BOBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than BOBP's 23.45% return.

MBSF

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 2.16%
• 6M: 2.25%
• 1Y: 5.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOBP

• 1D: -4.54%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 23.45%
• 6M: 21.39%
• 1Y: 32.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBSF vs. BOBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	2.16%	4.12%
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	23.45%	7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and BOBP is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

MBSF vs. BOBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSF

MBSF Risk / Return Rank: 78
MBSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
MBSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MBSF Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MBSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MBSF Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BOBP

BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 54
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBSF vs. BOBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBSF	BOBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.57	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	2.15	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.30	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.14	2.51	+4.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.37	10.75	+9.62

MBSF vs. BOBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the BOBP Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSF and BOBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. BOBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum BOBP drawdown of -13.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and BOBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBSF	BOBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-13.06%	+12.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.79%	-13.06%	+12.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.54%	+4.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-1.69%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	3.05%	-2.77%

Volatility

MBSF vs. BOBP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) is 0.57%, while CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that MBSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBSF	BOBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.57%	10.90%	-10.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	18.88%	-16.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95%	20.90%	-17.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.31%	20.22%	-16.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.31%	20.22%	-16.91%

MBSF vs. BOBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BOBP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBSF vs. BOBP - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than BOBP's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	2.68%	3.31%	0.00%
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	4.46%	4.71%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBSF and BOBP in my portfolio?

MBSF and BOBP have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBSF or BOBP?

BOBP has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to MBSF (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBSF dropped -0.97% vs BOBP's -13.06%.

Which ETF is better, MBSF or BOBP?

On 1-year performance, BOBP leads with 32.67% vs 5.62% for MBSF. On fees, MBSF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MBSF has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MBSF or BOBP?

Over the 1-year period, BOBP has performed better with a 32.67% return vs 5.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBSF or BOBP?

MBSF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBSF or BOBP?

MBSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 2.68% for BOBP.

What is the main difference between MBSF and BOBP?

MBSF is categorized as Bank Loan, while BOBP is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Regan and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MBSF and 0.70% for BOBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.