MBSD vs. JMTG
MBSD (FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund) and JMTG (JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. MBSD is passively managed, while JMTG is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MBSD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JMTG.
Performance
MBSD vs. JMTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBSD achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than JMTG's 0.45% return.
MBSD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
JMTG
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBSD vs. JMTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MBSD FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund | 0.42% | 3.09% |
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.45% | 3.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBSD and JMTG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBSD vs. JMTG — Risk / Return Rank
MBSD
JMTG
MBSD vs. JMTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD) and JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBSD | JMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBSD | JMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.29 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
MBSD vs. JMTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBSD drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, which is greater than JMTG's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSD and JMTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBSD | JMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -2.78% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -1.79% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -0.66% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | — | — |
Volatility
MBSD vs. JMTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBSD | JMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 3.68% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 3.68% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 3.68% | +0.58% |
MBSD vs. JMTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBSD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JMTG's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MBSD vs. JMTG - Dividend Comparison
MBSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than JMTG's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 3.92% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MBSD FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund | 4.19% | 4.23% | 3.91% | 3.39% | 3.03% | 2.41% | 2.78% | 3.42% | 3.22% | 3.30% | 3.02% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBSD and JMTG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBSD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBSD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JMTG.
MBSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 3.92% for JMTG.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MBSD and 0.24% for JMTG.
Find the right allocation for MBSD and JMTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer