PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBSD vs. DEED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBSD vs. DEED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD) and First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSD achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than DEED's 0.32% return.


MBSD

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.52%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.37%

DEED

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.49%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBSD vs. DEED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MBSD
FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund
0.42%7.12%2.30%4.46%-9.49%-1.40%1.86%
DEED
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF
0.32%8.91%3.19%6.43%-16.03%1.62%4.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MBSD and DEED is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.71

The correlation between MBSD and DEED has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBSD vs. DEED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSD
MBSD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MBSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DEED
DEED Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEED Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEED Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBSD vs. DEED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD) and First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBSDDEEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.06

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

5.79

+1.92

MBSD vs. DEED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the DEED Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSD and DEED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBSDDEEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.66

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.03

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.19

+0.18

Drawdowns

MBSD vs. DEED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSD drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum DEED drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSD and DEED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBSDDEEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-19.96%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-3.18%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

-8.50%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.10%

-19.96%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-2.05%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-6.62%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.13%

-0.45%

Volatility

MBSD vs. DEED - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD) and First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) have volatilities of 1.15% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBSDDEEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.10%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

2.87%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

3.94%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

6.54%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

5.97%

-1.71%

MBSD vs. DEED - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DEED's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBSD vs. DEED - Dividend Comparison

MBSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than DEED's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEED
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF
4.28%4.10%5.73%5.59%2.43%1.93%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MBSD
FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund
4.19%4.23%3.91%3.39%3.03%2.41%2.78%3.42%3.22%3.30%3.02%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBSD and DEED have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBSD has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to DEED (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBSD dropped -14.36% vs DEED's -19.96%.

On 5-year performance, MBSD leads with 0.62% vs 0.21% for DEED. On fees, MBSD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MBSD has performed better with a 0.62% return vs 0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBSD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DEED.

DEED has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 4.19% for MBSD.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MBSD and 0.65% for DEED.

DEED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBSD and DEED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer