DEED vs. CMBS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DEED (First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF) and CMBS (iShares CMBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. DEED is actively managed, while CMBS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEED returned 0.25%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CMBS. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEED charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CMBS.

Performance

DEED vs. CMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEED achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than CMBS's 0.18% return.

DEED

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 6.56%
• 3Y*: 4.95%
• 5Y*: 0.25%
• 10Y*: —

CMBS

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: 2.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEED vs. CMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DEED First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF	0.42%	8.91%	3.19%	6.43%	-16.03%	1.62%	4.71%
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF	0.18%	7.67%	4.27%	5.06%	-11.21%	-1.82%	5.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DEED and CMBS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020	0.52

The correlation between DEED and CMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DEED vs. CMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEED

DEED Risk / Return Rank: 44
DEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
DEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
DEED Omega Ratio Rank: 47
DEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
DEED Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CMBS

CMBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
CMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
CMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEED vs. CMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEED	CMBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.19	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.81	+0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.21	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	1.78	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.53	5.01	+0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEED vs. CMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEED Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the CMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEED and CMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEED	CMBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.19	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.15	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.43	-0.24

Drawdowns

DEED vs. CMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEED drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, which is greater than CMBS's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEED and CMBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEED	CMBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.96%	-15.87%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.18%	-2.44%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.50%	-3.29%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.96%	-15.87%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-15.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-1.73%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.62%	-2.95%	-3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	0.87%	+0.25%

Volatility

DEED vs. CMBS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) have volatilities of 1.11% and 1.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEED	CMBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	1.13%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	2.83%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96%	3.71%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.54%	5.31%	+1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.98%	5.77%	+0.21%

DEED vs. CMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEED has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CMBS's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEED vs. CMBS - Dividend Comparison

DEED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than CMBS's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF	3.58%	3.45%	3.31%	2.97%	2.65%	2.46%	2.83%	2.74%	2.70%	2.50%	2.29%	2.31%
DEED First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF	4.27%	4.10%	5.73%	5.59%	2.43%	1.93%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEED and CMBS in my portfolio?

DEED and CMBS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEED or CMBS?

CMBS has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to DEED (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEED dropped -19.96% vs CMBS's -15.87%.

Which ETF is better, DEED or CMBS?

On 5-year performance, CMBS leads with 0.79% vs 0.25% for DEED. On fees, CMBS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEED or CMBS?

Over the 5-year period, CMBS has performed better with a 0.79% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEED or CMBS?

CMBS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DEED.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEED or CMBS?

DEED has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 3.58% for CMBS.

What is the main difference between DEED and CMBS?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DEED and 0.25% for CMBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.