PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEED vs. ALLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEED vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) and State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEED achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than ALLW's 6.18% return.


DEED

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.59%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.11%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.04%

ALLW

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.17%
6M
1.32%
YTD
6.18%
1Y
16.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.30M$11.74M$18.27M
$2.24M$2.09M$938.56K

DEED vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DEED and ALLW is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEED vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEED
DEED Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEED Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEED Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEED vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) and State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEEDALLWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

2.42

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

8.24

-4.62

DEED vs. ALLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEED Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the ALLW Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEED and ALLW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEED vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEED drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, which is greater than ALLW's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEED and ALLW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEDALLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-8.78%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-7.23%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-3.54%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-1.42%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

2.12%

-0.84%

Volatility

DEED vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) is 1.19%, while State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that DEED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEDALLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

2.86%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

9.22%

-6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

11.15%

-7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

12.45%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.93%

12.45%

-6.52%

DEED vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEED has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEED vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison

DEED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than ALLW's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ALLW
State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.40%4.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DEED
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF
4.48%4.10%5.73%5.59%2.43%1.93%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEED and ALLW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALLW has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to DEED (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEED dropped -19.96% vs ALLW's -8.78%.

On 1-year performance, ALLW leads with 16.99% vs 3.81% for DEED. On fees, DEED is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DEED has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ALLW has performed better with a 16.99% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEED is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ALLW.

DEED has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 4.40% for ALLW.

DEED is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while ALLW is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DEED and 0.85% for ALLW.

ALLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEED and ALLW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer