PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBOX vs. TYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBOX vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBOX achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than TYLD's 1.50% return.


MBOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.07%
YTD
15.47%
6M
14.89%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*

TYLD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBOX vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
15.47%8.72%17.79%
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
1.50%4.05%5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MBOX and TYLD is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBOX vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBOX
MBOX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TYLD
TYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBOX vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBOXTYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

2.55

-1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

34.31

-30.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

125.35

-111.47

MBOX vs. TYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the TYLD Sharpe Ratio of 5.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBOX and TYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBOXTYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

5.42

-3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

2.53

-1.70

Drawdowns

MBOX vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBOX drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, which is greater than TYLD's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBOX and TYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBOXTYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-1.06%

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-0.12%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-0.11%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

0.03%

+1.70%

Volatility

MBOX vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison

Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) at 0.26%. This indicates that MBOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBOXTYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

0.26%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

0.55%

+7.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

0.75%

+10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

1.77%

+12.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

1.77%

+12.70%

MBOX vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBOX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBOX vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison

MBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than TYLD's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
1.89%1.94%1.60%2.13%2.87%1.17%
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
4.69%4.38%4.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBOX and TYLD have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBOX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to TYLD (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBOX dropped -16.42% vs TYLD's -1.06%.

On 1-year performance, MBOX leads with 23.95% vs 4.06% for TYLD. On fees, MBOX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MBOX has performed better with a 23.95% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBOX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TYLD.

TYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.89% for MBOX.

They also come from different issuers: EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MBOX and 0.59% for TYLD.

TYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.42 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBOX and TYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer