MBND vs. IBMO
MBND (SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MBND is actively managed, while IBMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MBND returned 0.64%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for IBMO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MBND charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMO.
Performance
MBND vs. IBMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBND achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than IBMO's 0.95% return.
MBND
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
IBMO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
MBND vs. IBMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBND SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF | 1.19% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 5.62% | -8.61% | 0.59% |
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.95% | 3.11% | 1.97% | 2.90% | -5.36% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBND and IBMO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MBND and IBMO has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBND vs. IBMO — Risk / Return Rank
MBND
IBMO
MBND vs. IBMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBND | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.53 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 7.38 | -5.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 21.93 | -14.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBND | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.54 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.31 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.41 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
MBND vs. IBMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBND drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, smaller than the maximum IBMO drawdown of -14.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBND and IBMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBND | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -14.77% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -0.38% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.57% | -1.76% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.18% | -8.86% | -4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -2.32% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 0.13% | +0.61% |
Volatility
MBND vs. IBMO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) at 0.19%. This indicates that MBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBND | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 0.19% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.81% | 0.83% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50% | 1.10% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 2.15% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.41% | 4.52% | -1.11% |
MBND vs. IBMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMO's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBND vs. IBMO - Dividend Comparison
MBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than IBMO's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.39% | 2.37% | 2.15% | 1.65% | 0.89% | 0.62% | 1.03% | 1.01% |
MBND SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF | 3.49% | 3.43% | 2.72% | 2.53% | 1.61% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBND and IBMO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MBND has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to IBMO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBND dropped -13.18% vs IBMO's -14.77%.
On 5-year performance, IBMO leads with 0.67% vs 0.64% for MBND. On fees, IBMO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBMO has performed better with a 0.67% return vs 0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBND.
MBND has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.39% for IBMO.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MBND and 0.18% for IBMO.
IBMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBND and IBMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer