PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBND vs. JPMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBND vs. JPMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBND achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than JPMB's 0.76% return.


MBND

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-1.05%
YTD
-0.25%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.42%

JPMB

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.48%
6M
0.58%
YTD
0.76%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$317.74K$415.08K$340.28K
$354.99K$234.86K$188.93K

MBND vs. JPMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MBND
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF
-0.25%2.90%2.75%5.62%-8.61%0.49%
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
0.76%13.73%1.46%9.48%-16.05%-1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MBND and JPMB is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021

0.47

The correlation between MBND and JPMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBND vs. JPMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBND
MBND Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBND Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBND Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

JPMB
JPMB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBND vs. JPMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBNDJPMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.54

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.37

6.27

-1.90

MBND vs. JPMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the JPMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBND and JPMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBND vs. JPMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBND drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, smaller than the maximum JPMB drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBND and JPMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBNDJPMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-26.33%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-4.61%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.57%

-6.63%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.16%

-26.16%

+13.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.69%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-6.94%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.12%

-0.32%

Volatility

MBND vs. JPMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) is 0.92%, while JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that MBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBNDJPMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.27%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

4.62%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78%

5.40%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.53%

8.95%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.42%

9.59%

-6.17%

MBND vs. JPMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JPMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBND vs. JPMB - Dividend Comparison

MBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than JPMB's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
5.37%6.71%6.32%5.99%4.94%4.29%4.29%4.51%4.58%
MBND
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF
3.22%3.43%2.72%2.53%1.61%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBND and JPMB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPMB has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to MBND (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBND dropped -13.18% vs JPMB's -26.33%.

On 5-year performance, JPMB leads with 1.08% vs 0.18% for MBND. On fees, JPMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MBND has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JPMB has performed better with a 1.08% return vs 0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBND.

JPMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.37%, compared with 3.22% for MBND.

MBND is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while JPMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MBND and 0.39% for JPMB.

JPMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBND and JPMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer