MBND vs. FMUN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MBND (SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF) and FMUN (Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MBND returned 4.70% vs 7.10% for FMUN. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MBND charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMUN.

Performance

MBND vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBND achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than FMUN's 1.75% return.

MBND

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 3.54%
• 5Y*: 0.65%
• 10Y*: —

FMUN

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 7.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBND vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MBND SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF	1.21%	2.20%
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF	1.75%	3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MBND and FMUN is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.62

The correlation between MBND and FMUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MBND vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBND

MBND Risk / Return Rank: 57
MBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
MBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
MBND Omega Ratio Rank: 74
MBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MBND Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FMUN

FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 70
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBND vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBND	FMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.30	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.32	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.50	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	2.22	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.29	7.19	-0.90

MBND vs. FMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FMUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBND and FMUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MBND vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBND drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, which is greater than FMUN's maximum drawdown of -3.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBND and FMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBND	FMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.18%	-3.83%	-9.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	-3.21%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.61%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-1.12%	-3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	0.99%	-0.24%

Volatility

MBND vs. FMUN - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) at 0.99%. This indicates that MBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBND	FMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	0.99%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	2.39%	-0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69%	3.11%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.51%	4.12%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.43%	4.12%	-0.69%

MBND vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBND vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison

MBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than FMUN's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF	3.29%	2.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MBND SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF	3.49%	3.43%	2.72%	2.53%	1.61%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBND and FMUN in my portfolio?

MBND and FMUN have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBND or FMUN?

MBND has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to FMUN (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBND dropped -13.18% vs FMUN's -3.83%.

Which ETF is better, MBND or FMUN?

On 1-year performance, FMUN leads with 7.10% vs 4.70% for MBND. On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FMUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MBND or FMUN?

Over the 1-year period, FMUN has performed better with a 7.10% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBND or FMUN?

FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBND or FMUN?

MBND has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 3.29% for FMUN.

What is the main difference between MBND and FMUN?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MBND and 0.05% for FMUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.