PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBND vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBND vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBND achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


MBND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.54%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBND vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MBND
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF
1.12%2.90%2.75%5.62%-8.61%0.59%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%39.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MBND and DBE is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

-0.07

The correlation between MBND and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBND vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBND
MBND Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBND Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBND Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBND vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBNDDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.40

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

5.89

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

11.53

-4.25

MBND vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBND Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBND and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBNDDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.43

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.67

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.09

+0.11

Drawdowns

MBND vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBND drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBND and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBNDDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-86.69%

+73.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-14.41%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.57%

-23.89%

+19.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.18%

-38.74%

+25.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-30.27%

+29.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-57.31%

+53.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

7.35%

-6.62%

Volatility

MBND vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) is 1.05%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that MBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBNDDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

12.95%

-11.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

30.86%

-29.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

34.97%

-32.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.48%

29.39%

-25.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.41%

28.33%

-24.92%

MBND vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBND vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

MBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
MBND
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF
3.49%3.43%2.72%2.53%1.61%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBND and DBE have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to MBND (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBND dropped -13.18% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 19.66% vs 0.63% for MBND. On fees, MBND is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, MBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 0.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBND is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

MBND has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.

MBND is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MBND and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBND and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer