MBDFX vs. QDIBX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MBDFX (AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund) and QDIBX (Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MBDFX returned -0.58%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QDIBX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MBDFX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for QDIBX.

Performance

MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBDFX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than QDIBX's 0.11% return.

MBDFX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.28%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: -0.58%
• 10Y*: 1.29%

QDIBX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: 4.47%
• 5Y*: 0.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund	0.17%	7.29%	1.24%	5.73%	-13.85%	-3.34%	7.33%	0.32%
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	0.11%	7.72%	1.66%	6.71%	-14.11%	-0.17%	6.77%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MBDFX and QDIBX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019	0.91

The correlation between MBDFX and QDIBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MBDFX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBDFX

MBDFX Risk / Return Rank: 17
MBDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MBDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MBDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MBDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MBDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

QDIBX

QDIBX Risk / Return Rank: 18
QDIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QDIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QDIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
QDIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
QDIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBDFX	QDIBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.16	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	1.74	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.21	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	1.46	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	4.09	-0.36

MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the QDIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBDFX and QDIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBDFX drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, which is greater than QDIBX's maximum drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBDFX and QDIBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBDFX	QDIBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.66%	-19.63%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-2.97%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.99%	-5.37%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.54%	-19.63%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-1.65%	-2.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-6.35%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	1.06%	+0.13%

Volatility

MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison

AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) at 1.01%. This indicates that MBDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBDFX	QDIBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	1.01%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	2.65%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83%	3.73%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.16%	6.59%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.06%	6.25%	-1.19%

MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBDFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison

MBDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, which matches QDIBX's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund	3.46%	3.66%	3.50%	2.92%	2.16%	2.35%	1.84%	2.40%	2.30%	2.10%	2.06%	4.17%
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	3.49%	3.50%	3.55%	3.65%	2.51%	1.80%	3.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBDFX and QDIBX in my portfolio?

MBDFX and QDIBX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBDFX or QDIBX?

MBDFX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to QDIBX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBDFX dropped -20.66% vs QDIBX's -19.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.