MBDFX vs. QDIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX).
MBDFX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Apr 30, 1993. QDIBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.
Performance
MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund | -0.93% | 7.29% | 1.24% | 5.73% | -13.85% | -3.34% | 7.33% | -0.15% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | -0.22% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBDFX achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than QDIBX's -0.22% return.
MBDFX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
QDIBX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBDFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MBDFX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank
MBDFX
QDIBX
MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBDFX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.03 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.51 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.00 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 5.89 | -1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBDFX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.03 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.07 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.16 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between MBDFX and QDIBX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison
MBDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than QDIBX's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund | 3.43% | 3.66% | 3.50% | 2.92% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.30% | 2.10% | 2.06% | 4.17% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.51% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBDFX drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, which is greater than QDIBX's maximum drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBDFX and QDIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBDFX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.66% | -19.63% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.24% | -2.58% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -19.63% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -1.98% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -6.52% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.87% | +0.10% |
Volatility
MBDFX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison
AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) at 1.51%. This indicates that MBDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MBDFX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.64% | 1.51% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 2.54% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 4.32% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.13% | 6.58% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 6.32% | -1.27% |