PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBDFX vs. SKSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBDFX vs. SKSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBDFX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than SKSEX's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MBDFX has underperformed SKSEX with an annualized return of 1.27%, while SKSEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.09% annualized return.


MBDFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
1.27%

SKSEX

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
16.87%
6M
9.02%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBDFX vs. SKSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBDFX
AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund
-0.05%7.29%1.24%5.73%-13.85%-3.34%7.33%9.70%-1.11%3.88%
SKSEX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund
16.87%-4.50%10.60%17.49%-15.36%33.22%3.30%38.26%-18.98%8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MBDFX and SKSEX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1993

-0.08

The correlation between MBDFX and SKSEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBDFX vs. SKSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBDFX
MBDFX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MBDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MBDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SKSEX
SKSEX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SKSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SKSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBDFX vs. SKSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBDFXSKSEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

1.70

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.22

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.84

6.22

-1.38

MBDFX vs. SKSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the SKSEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBDFX and SKSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBDFXSKSEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.26

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.37

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Drawdowns

MBDFX vs. SKSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBDFX drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, smaller than the maximum SKSEX drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBDFX and SKSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBDFXSKSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-65.26%

+44.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-10.83%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.99%

-26.39%

+19.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

-26.39%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.66%

-49.36%

+28.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

-2.83%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-9.23%

+5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

3.87%

-2.76%

Volatility

MBDFX vs. SKSEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) is 1.35%, while AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that MBDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SKSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBDFXSKSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

5.15%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

15.62%

-12.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

19.53%

-15.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.15%

21.47%

-15.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

24.50%

-19.44%

MBDFX vs. SKSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBDFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than SKSEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBDFX vs. SKSEX - Dividend Comparison

MBDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while SKSEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBDFX
AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund
3.47%3.66%3.50%2.92%2.16%2.35%1.84%2.40%2.30%2.10%2.06%4.17%
SKSEX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.62%1.51%1.69%13.94%43.15%13.91%14.98%6.75%0.02%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBDFX and SKSEX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKSEX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to MBDFX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBDFX dropped -20.66% vs SKSEX's -65.26%.

SKSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBDFX and SKSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer