MBDFX vs. MGFIX
MBDFX (AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund) and MGFIX (AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - MBDFX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by AMG, while MGFIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MBDFX returned 1.29%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for MGFIX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MBDFX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MGFIX.
Performance
MBDFX vs. MGFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBDFX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than MGFIX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MBDFX has underperformed MGFIX with an annualized return of 1.29%, while MGFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.38% annualized return.
MBDFX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 1.29%
MGFIX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
MBDFX vs. MGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund | 0.17% | 7.29% | 1.24% | 5.73% | -13.85% | -3.34% | 7.33% | 9.70% | -1.11% | 3.88% |
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 0.63% | 7.26% | 1.50% | 6.69% | -13.17% | -9.68% | 7.34% | 11.11% | -1.82% | 6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBDFX and MGFIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1993 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MBDFX and MGFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.98 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBDFX vs. MGFIX — Risk / Return Rank
MBDFX
MGFIX
MBDFX vs. MGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBDFX | MGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.68 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 4.86 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBDFX vs. MGFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBDFX drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, smaller than the maximum MGFIX drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBDFX and MGFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBDFX | MGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.66% | -25.03% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -2.93% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.99% | -6.75% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -19.68% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.66% | -25.03% | +4.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | -8.33% | +4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -4.81% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.01% | +0.18% |
Volatility
MBDFX vs. MGFIX - Volatility Comparison
AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) have volatilities of 1.19% and 1.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBDFX | MGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 1.15% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 2.78% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83% | 3.65% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 5.77% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 5.25% | -0.19% |
MBDFX vs. MGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBDFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than MGFIX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBDFX vs. MGFIX - Dividend Comparison
MBDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than MGFIX's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund | 3.46% | 3.66% | 3.50% | 2.92% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.30% | 2.10% | 2.06% | 4.17% |
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 4.06% | 3.85% | 3.56% | 2.94% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 3.38% | 4.20% | 3.89% | 3.81% | 4.96% | 4.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MBDFX and MGFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MBDFX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to MGFIX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBDFX dropped -20.66% vs MGFIX's -25.03%.
MGFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBDFX and MGFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer