MBDFX vs. BLUEX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MBDFX (AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both mutual funds - MBDFX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by AMG, while BLUEX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MBDFX returned 0.99%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for BLUEX. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MBDFX charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.

Performance

MBDFX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBDFX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MBDFX has underperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 0.99%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.

MBDFX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: -1.47%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 1Y: 1.27%
• 3Y*: 3.52%
• 5Y*: -1.04%
• 10Y*: 0.99%
• ALL TIME*: 2.20%

BLUEX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: 0.53%
• YTD: -1.30%
• 1Y: 2.01%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: 9.72%
• ALL TIME*: 9.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MBDFX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund	-1.16%	7.29%	1.24%	5.73%	-13.85%	-3.34%	7.33%	9.70%	-1.11%	3.88%
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-1.30%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	-4.91%	27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MBDFX and BLUEX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1993	-0.02

The correlation between MBDFX and BLUEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MBDFX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBDFX

MBDFX Risk / Return Rank: 13
MBDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MBDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
MBDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MBDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MBDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 5
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBDFX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBDFX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	0.05	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	0.16	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.02	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	0.05	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.45	0.11	+1.35

MBDFX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBDFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBDFX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MBDFX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBDFX drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBDFX and BLUEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBDFX	BLUEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.66%	-54.27%	+33.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-12.19%	+8.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.74%	-12.19%	+6.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.47%	-21.87%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.66%	-29.06%	+8.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.57%	-3.35%	-2.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.97%	-13.34%	+9.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	5.56%	-4.14%

Volatility

MBDFX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) is 1.11%, while AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that MBDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBDFX	BLUEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	3.80%	-2.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.01%	8.91%	-5.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85%	10.90%	-7.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.17%	10.85%	-4.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.06%	16.57%	-11.51%

MBDFX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBDFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBDFX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

MBDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than BLUEX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.32%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
MBDFX AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund	3.24%	3.66%	3.50%	2.92%	2.16%	2.35%	1.84%	2.40%	2.30%	2.10%	2.06%	4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBDFX and BLUEX in my portfolio?

MBDFX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBDFX or BLUEX?

BLUEX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to MBDFX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBDFX dropped -20.66% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.