PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCE vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCE vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBCE

1D
-1.43%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ILCG

1D
-0.06%
1M
6.73%
YTD
14.41%
6M
14.04%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
26.58%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
18.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCE vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


MBCE vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MBCE
ILCG

Technology

42.3%
49.8%

Healthcare

13.9%
5.3%

Financial Services

11.2%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.6%

Real Estate

7.6%
1.4%

Communication Services

7.1%
14.5%

Industrials

3.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Energy

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

0.8%

Technology

MBCE
42.3%
ILCG
49.8%

Healthcare

MBCE
13.9%
ILCG
5.3%

Financial Services

MBCE
11.2%
ILCG
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MBCE
10.9%
ILCG
10.6%

Real Estate

MBCE
7.6%
ILCG
1.4%

Communication Services

MBCE
7.1%
ILCG
14.5%

Industrials

MBCE
3.6%
ILCG
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

MBCE
3.5%
ILCG
1.6%

Basic Materials

MBCE

-

ILCG
1.1%

Energy

MBCE

-

ILCG
0.5%

Utilities

MBCE

-

ILCG
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCE vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCE

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCE vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBCE vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCEILCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

Drawdowns

MBCE vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -1.43%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCEILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-52.98%

+51.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-1.08%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-8.22%

+6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

Volatility

MBCE vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCEILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

MBCE vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCE vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.40%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
MBCE
Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.

ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.

MBCE tracks Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.04% for ILCG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCE and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer