MBCE vs. ILCG
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MBCE tracks the Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index while ILCG tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
MBCE vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 28.93%
- 3Y*
- 26.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
MBCE vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -1.43% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | -0.06% |
MBCE vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MBCE
ILCG
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MBCE
ILCG
Healthcare
MBCE
ILCG
Financial Services
MBCE
ILCG
Consumer Cyclical
MBCE
ILCG
Real Estate
MBCE
ILCG
Communication Services
MBCE
ILCG
Industrials
MBCE
ILCG
Consumer Defensive
MBCE
ILCG
Basic Materials
MBCE
-
ILCG
Energy
MBCE
-
ILCG
Utilities
MBCE
-
ILCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
MBCE
ILCG
MBCE vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCE | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.59 | — |
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -1.43%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -52.98% | +51.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.08% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -8.22% | +6.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.43% | — |
Volatility
MBCE vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.30% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.99% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.53% | — |
MBCE vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.
MBCE tracks Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.04% for ILCG.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer