MBCC vs. BDGS

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MBCC is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. MBCC charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

MBCC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF (MBCC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MBCC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 5.34%
• YTD: 5.47%
• 1Y: 11.79%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCC vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF	0.00%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	-0.44%

Return for Risk

MBCC vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF (MBCC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBCC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.87	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.94	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.04	—

Drawdowns

MBCC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCC and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBCC	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-9.12%	+9.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.98%	+0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.67%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MBCC	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	6.35%	-6.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	8.20%	-8.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	8.20%	-8.20%

MBCC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCC has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBCC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MBCC or BDGS?

On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBCC or BDGS?

BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBCC or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.

What is the main difference between MBCC and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCC and 0.87% for BDGS.