MBBA vs. DGRO
MBBA (iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by iShares, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. MBBA is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MBBA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
MBBA vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBBA
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
MBBA vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 0.64% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBA and DGRO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBA vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
MBBA
DGRO
MBBA vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBBA | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.76 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
MBBA vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBA | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -35.10% | +32.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.28% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -3.44% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility
MBBA vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBA | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66% | 9.48% | -4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 13.82% | -9.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 16.62% | -11.96% |
MBBA vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MBBA vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBA and DGRO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBA.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.84% for MBBA.
MBBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.08% for DGRO.
Find the right allocation for MBBA and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer