PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBBA vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBBA vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBBA

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.53%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBBA vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MBBA and DGRO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBBA vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBBA

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBBA vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBBA vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBBADGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.76

-0.37

Drawdowns

MBBA vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBADGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-35.10%

+32.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.28%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-3.44%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

Volatility

MBBA vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBBADGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.66%

9.48%

-4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

13.82%

-9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

16.62%

-11.96%

MBBA vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MBBA vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
MBBA
iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF
1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBBA and DGRO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBA.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.84% for MBBA.

MBBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.08% for DGRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBBA and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer