PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBB vs. VGIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBB vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MBB has outperformed VGIT with an annualized return of 1.30%, while VGIT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.23% annualized return.


MBB

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.71%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.30%

VGIT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
3.54%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
1.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBB vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBB
iShares MBS Bond ETF
0.58%8.38%1.31%5.01%-11.74%-1.43%4.08%6.18%0.82%2.49%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.46%7.34%1.39%4.28%-10.53%-2.64%7.71%6.19%1.35%1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MBB and VGIT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.81

The correlation between MBB and VGIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBB vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBB
MBB Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VGIT
VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBB vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBBVGITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.25

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

3.75

+3.89

MBB vs. VGIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the VGIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBB and VGIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBBVGITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.05

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.01

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.27

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.49

+0.09

Drawdowns

MBB vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBB drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, which is greater than VGIT's maximum drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBB and VGIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBVGITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.64%

-16.05%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-2.83%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.68%

-4.34%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-15.02%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.64%

-16.05%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-2.39%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.35%

-3.52%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.94%

-0.05%

Volatility

MBB vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) at 1.05%. This indicates that MBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBBVGITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.05%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

2.33%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

3.38%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

5.38%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.31%

4.50%

+0.81%

MBB vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MBB vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison

MBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than VGIT's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBB
iShares MBS Bond ETF
4.28%4.21%3.94%3.40%2.31%1.05%2.10%2.77%2.64%2.23%2.58%2.66%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.87%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MBB and VGIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MBB has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to VGIT (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBB dropped -17.64% vs VGIT's -16.05%.

On 10-year performance, MBB leads with 1.30% vs 1.23% for VGIT. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MBB has performed better with a 1.30% return vs 1.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for MBB.

MBB has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.87% for VGIT.

MBB is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while VGIT is Government Bonds. MBB tracks Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for MBB and 0.03% for VGIT.

MBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBB and VGIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer