PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAZE vs. WLDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAZE vs. WLDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE) and Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAZE achieves a -41.95% return, which is significantly lower than WLDN's -7.10% return.


MAZE

1D
-0.17%
1M
-9.00%
YTD
-41.95%
6M
-38.11%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WLDN

1D
-1.21%
1M
5.06%
YTD
-7.10%
6M
-6.97%
1Y
72.52%
3Y*
71.89%
5Y*
19.75%
10Y*
24.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAZE vs. WLDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MAZE
Maze Therapeutics, Inc
-41.95%157.01%
WLDN
Willdan Group, Inc.
-7.10%184.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MAZE and WLDN is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAZE:

$1.30B

WLDN:

$1.48B

EPS

MAZE:

-$2.63

WLDN:

$3.71

PB Ratio

MAZE:

3.79

WLDN:

4.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAZE:

$0.00

WLDN:

$684.28M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAZE:

-$1.15M

WLDN:

$261.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

MAZE:

-$126.66M

WLDN:

$64.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAZE vs. WLDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAZE
MAZE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MAZE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAZE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAZE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MAZE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAZE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

WLDN
WLDN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
WLDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDN Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDN Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAZE vs. WLDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE) and Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAZEWLDNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.16

2.99

+0.17

MAZE vs. WLDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAZE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the WLDN Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAZE and WLDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAZE vs. WLDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAZE drawdown since its inception was -54.51%, smaller than the maximum WLDN drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAZE and WLDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAZEWLDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.51%

-89.19%

+34.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.51%

-50.41%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.60%

-28.63%

-24.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-42.35%

+21.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.60%

23.78%

+0.82%

Volatility

MAZE vs. WLDN - Volatility Comparison

Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) at 8.81%. This indicates that MAZE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WLDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAZEWLDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.72%

8.81%

+2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.26%

50.77%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.54%

65.10%

+24.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.20%

55.91%

+38.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.20%

54.13%

+40.07%

Dividends

MAZE vs. WLDN - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAZE nor WLDN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MAZE vs. WLDN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Maze Therapeutics, Inc and Willdan Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April0
155.11M
(MAZE) Total Revenue
(WLDN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MAZE and WLDN have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAZE has higher volatility (11.72%) compared to WLDN (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAZE dropped -54.51% vs WLDN's -89.19%.

WLDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAZE and WLDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer