MAYZ vs. UXJL
MAYZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. MAYZ is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MAYZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
MAYZ vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAYZ achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
MAYZ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAYZ vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAYZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF | 8.56% | 7.06% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAYZ and UXJL is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAYZ vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
MAYZ
UXJL
MAYZ vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAYZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAYZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.87 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
MAYZ vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAYZ drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYZ and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAYZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -10.29% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.76% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -1.51% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | — | — |
Volatility
MAYZ vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAYZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 13.90% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.07% | 13.90% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 13.90% | -1.86% |
MAYZ vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAYZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAYZ vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
MAYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAYZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF | 1.98% | 2.15% | 1.95% | 2.75% | 0.69% | 1.90% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MAYZ and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MAYZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAYZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
MAYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MAYZ and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for MAYZ and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer