MAYZ vs. JULB
MAYZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. MAYZ is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MAYZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
MAYZ vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAYZ achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.35% return.
MAYZ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAYZ vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAYZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF | 8.56% | 2.43% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.35% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAYZ and JULB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAYZ vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank
MAYZ
JULB
MAYZ vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAYZ | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAYZ | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 2.17 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
MAYZ vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAYZ drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYZ and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAYZ | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -5.24% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.07% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -0.87% | -3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | — | — |
Volatility
MAYZ vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAYZ | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 6.81% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.07% | 6.81% | +5.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 6.81% | +5.23% |
MAYZ vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAYZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAYZ vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
MAYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAYZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF | 1.98% | 2.15% | 1.95% | 2.75% | 0.69% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MAYZ and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MAYZ.
MAYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MAYZ and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for MAYZ and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer