PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAYU vs. NVBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAYU vs. NVBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYU achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than NVBT's 10.00% return.


MAYU

1D
1.56%
1M
2.85%
6M
10.10%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
18.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.97%

NVBT

1D
0.99%
1M
2.58%
6M
9.10%
YTD
10.00%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
12.21%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$190.95K$168.06K$454.97K
$37.90K$70.18K$49.93K

MAYU vs. NVBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAYU
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF
11.03%10.89%13.50%
NVBT
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF
10.00%12.84%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYU and NVBT is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024

0.92

The correlation between MAYU and NVBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAYU vs. NVBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAYU
MAYU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MAYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAYU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MAYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAYU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NVBT
NVBT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAYU vs. NVBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAYUNVBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.62

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

12.39

-3.64

MAYU vs. NVBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYU Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the NVBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYU and NVBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAYU vs. NVBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYU drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, which is greater than NVBT's maximum drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYU and NVBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAYUNVBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-12.90%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-6.21%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-1.33%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.31%

+0.86%

Volatility

MAYU vs. NVBT - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) at 2.79%. This indicates that MAYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAYUNVBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

2.79%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

7.03%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

8.45%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

10.32%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

10.32%

+2.62%

MAYU vs. NVBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAYU and NVBT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

MAYU vs. NVBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYU nor NVBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MAYU and NVBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MAYU has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to NVBT (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYU dropped -15.37% vs NVBT's -12.90%.

On 1-year performance, MAYU leads with 18.93% vs 16.19% for NVBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, NVBT has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAYU has performed better with a 18.93% return vs 16.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAYU and NVBT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

MAYU and NVBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MAYU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NVBT is Options Trading.

NVBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAYU and NVBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer