MAYU vs. FEBT

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MAYU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF) and FEBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAYU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while FEBT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAYU returned 18.93% vs 17.63% for FEBT. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

MAYU vs. FEBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYU achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than FEBT's 10.09% return.

MAYU

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 2.85%
• 6M: 10.10%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.97%

FEBT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: 7.94%
• YTD: 10.09%
• 1Y: 17.63%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	$321.44K	$318.72K	$510.89K
MAYU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF	$190.95K	$168.06K	$454.97K

MAYU vs. FEBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAYU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF	11.03%	10.89%	13.50%
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	10.09%	12.72%	11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYU and FEBT is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024	0.94

The correlation between MAYU and FEBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAYU vs. FEBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAYU

MAYU Risk / Return Rank: 58
MAYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MAYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
MAYU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MAYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MAYU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FEBT

FEBT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FEBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FEBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FEBT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FEBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FEBT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAYU vs. FEBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAYU	FEBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.23	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	3.21	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.42	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.93	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.74	14.39	-5.64

MAYU vs. FEBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYU Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FEBT Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYU and FEBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAYU vs. FEBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYU drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, which is greater than FEBT's maximum drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYU and FEBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAYU	FEBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.37%	-13.19%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-6.04%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-1.15%	-1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	1.23%	+0.94%

Volatility

MAYU vs. FEBT - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) at 2.35%. This indicates that MAYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAYU	FEBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	2.35%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	6.51%	+2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	8.01%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.94%	9.70%	+3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.94%	9.70%	+3.24%

MAYU vs. FEBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAYU and FEBT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

MAYU vs. FEBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYU nor FEBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%
MAYU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAYU and FEBT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, MAYU and FEBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MAYU or FEBT?

MAYU has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to FEBT (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYU dropped -15.37% vs FEBT's -13.19%.

Which ETF is better, MAYU or FEBT?

On 1-year performance, MAYU leads with 18.93% vs 17.63% for FEBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, FEBT has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAYU or FEBT?

Over the 1-year period, MAYU has performed better with a 18.93% return vs 17.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAYU or FEBT?

MAYU and FEBT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAYU or FEBT?

MAYU and FEBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MAYU and FEBT?

MAYU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FEBT is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.